Every NFL season fans and analysts breakdown the preseason strength of schedule. We dissect it trying to figure out the games our favorite teams will win and predict the likelihood of a successful season. Do teams who play a weak schedule according to the previous year’s results have a higher success rate than teams who don’t? Teams change from year to year and we have seen bottom dwellers flip in one season and Super Bowl participants not even make the playoffs. Would you rather see a schedule full of teams who missed out on the playoffs and not named New England or Green Bay? Does avoiding the top teams from a season before guarantee success during the current season? These questions I wanted to answer and also follow this through the upcoming 2012 season. I went back and searched the strength of schedules heading into the 2008 through 2011 seasons and documented how teams with the top ten hardest schedules and top ten easiest schedules (all teams tied at the 10th spot were included) did during the regular season and playoffs. I looked at if these teams made the playoffs, won their division or made a Super Bowl appearance, here is what I found:
*Reminder – if there are more than 10 teams in a category, there was a tie at the 10 spot.
2011 Season
Most difficult schedule based on opponents’ 2010 record
- 3 of the 12 made the playoffs
- 2 of those 3 were division winners
- 0 teams made the Super Bowl
Easiest schedule based on opponents’ 2010 record
- 4 of the 10 made the playoffs
- 2 of those 4 were division winners
- 0 made the Super Bowl
2010 Season
Most difficult schedule based on opponents’ 2009 record
- 3 of the 11 made the playoffs
- All 3 were division winners
- 0 made the Super Bowl
Easiest schedule based on opponents’ 2009 record
- 4 of the 11 made the playoffs
- 1 of those 4 won the division
- 1 made and won the Super Bowl (Packers)
2009 Season
Most difficult schedule based on opponents’ 2008 record
- 4 of the 10 made the playoffs
- 2 of those 4 were a division winners
- 1 made and won the Super Bowl (Saints)
Easiest schedule based on opponents’ 2008 record
- 5 of the 11 made the playoffs
- 3 of 5 were division winners
- 0 made the Super Bowl
2008 Season
Most difficult schedule based on opponents’ 2007 record
- 5 of the 10 made playoffs
- 3 of those 5 were division winners
- 1 made and won the Super Bowl (Steelers)
Easiest schedule based on opponents’ 2007 record
- 5 of the 12 made the playoffs
- 4 of those 5 were division winners
- 1 made and lost in the Super Bowl (Cardinals)
2008 through 2011 Combined Results
Most Difficult
- 15 out of 43 made playoffs (35%)
- 10 of 15 won division titles (67%)
- 2 of the 4 years the SB winner came from this group
Easiest
- 18 of 44 made playoffs (41%)
- 10 of 18 won the division (56%)
- 1 super bowl winner and 1 loser came from this group
In conclusion, to me the preseason strength of schedule didn’t mean much between the years of 2008-2011. Only a small percentage of teams make the playoffs more frequent with an easier schedule. The same amount of division winners (more by percentage) and Super Bowl champions came from the group with the more difficult schedule. Understandably this is only a four-year sample and might not be big enough to draw a concrete conclusion but it is a starting point for what I want to document going forward. To me personally I don’t know if this preseason strength of schedule stat will lead to any success in the NFL but one way I do see taking advantage of this is the public perception of teams heading into the season. Sportsbooks are forced to use last season’s public perception when creating lines for early games in the current season and finding line value based on this could be beneficial.
I am always up for stat discussions and would like to hear what other preseason stats people use when preparing for the NFL season, or could preseason sos be used for any other purpose. Below is this year’s strength of schedule found at ESPN.com:
2012 NFL Strength of Schedule By Team
A look at the most difficult schedules in 2012 (based on opponents’ 2011 record).
|
Rank |
Team |
Combined W-L Record |
Winning Pct. |
Games vs. Quality Opp.** |
| 1 | N.Y. Giants* | 140-116 | .547 | 7 |
| 2 | Denver* | 139-117 | .543 | 7 |
| 3 | Cleveland | 135-121 | .527 | 7 |
| 4 | St. Louis | 134-122 | .523 | 5 |
| 4 | Baltimore* | 134-122 | .523 | 7 |
| 6 | San Diego | 133-123 | .520 | 6 |
| 7 | Philadelphia | 132-124 | .516 | 8 |
| 8 | Minnesota | 131-125 | .512 | 7 |
| 8 | Arizona | 131-125 | .512 | 6 |
| 10 | Carolina | 130-126 | .508 | 5 |
| 11 | Seattle | 129-127 | .504 | 5 |
| 11 | Dallas | 129-127 | .504 | 7 |
| 11 | New Orleans* | 129-127 | .504 | 5 |
| 14 | Jacksonville | 128-128 | .500 | 8 |
| 14 | Cincinnati* | 128-128 | .500 | 5 |
| 14 | Pittsburgh* | 128-128 | .500 | 6 |
| 14 | Indianapolis | 128-128 | .500 | 7 |
| 18 | Oakland | 127-129 | .496 | 5 |
| 18 | Miami | 127-129 | .496 | 6 |
| 20 | N.Y. Jets | 126-130 | .492 | 6 |
| 20 | Kansas City | 126-130 | .492 | 5 |
| 20 | Chicago | 126-130 | .492 | 7 |
| 20 | Detroit* | 126-130 | .492 | 6 |
| 24 | Washington | 125-131 | .488 | 7 |
| 24 | Atlanta* | 125-131 | .488 | 4 |
| 24 | San Francisco* | 125-131 | .488 | 5 |
| 27 | Tampa Bay | 124-132 | .484 | 5 |
| 28 | Tennessee | 123-133 | .480 | 6 |
| 29 | Houston* | 121-135 | .473 | 6 |
| 29 | Buffalo | 121-135 | .473 | 5 |
| 31 | Green Bay* | 120-136 | .469 | 7 |
| 32 | New England* | 116-140 | .453 | 4 |
| * 2011 playoff team. ** Quality opponents are teams that had at least nine wins in 2011. |
||||
Only the Steelers, Patriots, Ravens and used to be Colts were the only constant in the playoffs for years. Strenght of schedule is garbage like u said. Great research by the way, you did your homework. But at least 5 teams that didn’t make the playoffs the year before make it the following season. We see 3-13 teams go to 13-3 in one year. You never know!
Thanks for the comment Jason. We always hear about it before the season starts (to me its just a topic for ESPN to use during slow baseball months) but I was just curious if there were any trends. I agree with your point on teams always make the playoffs who missed it which highlights the preseason strength of schedule doesnt mean much when the season begins.
Interesting how there really is no rhyme or reason from year to year. Would have thought they might have been. Not sure I understand why the Patriots have the easiest schedule in the NFL this year…
Nice article-great info!
Great article Gary. I’m surprised ESPN hasn’t come up with a better method to create their SoS. A lot of games are decided by a field goal and a 8-8 team in the NFC East isn’t the same as an 8-8 team in the NFC West (at least over the past few seasons). I’m not sure what the best method is, but some kind of margin of victory or point differential would be a nice addition.
Then again…teams change season to season and some of the top rookies are making an impact in their first year, so historical data should be discounted.
Definitely could have an impact on public perception though like you said!
Thanks for the reply. Yeah the reason I wanted to do some research is because I never thought the preseason SOS mattered, just wanted some proof. Like I mentioned before, I think it is nothing but a story line to keep the NFL on all of our minds.
I love the idea of point differential being used for SOS, that is more accurate or even a power ranking.